
Serious concerns over environmental safety and public health were raised as a stern warning was issued by the Bombay High Court regarding the continued operation of the Kanjurmarg dumping ground in Mumbai. It was indicated that the site could be shut down if immediate and concrete actions were not taken by the Maharashtra government and civic authorities to address escalating pollution and hazardous methane emissions.
The situation was strongly criticised, and it was observed that a “casual approach” had been adopted by the authorities in monitoring and managing the landfill. Despite the formation of committees and review mechanisms, it was noted that meaningful improvements had not been achieved, raising concerns about the effectiveness of administrative efforts. The matter was described as one of urgency, with the court signalling that strict measures could be enforced if constitutional violations were identified.
Attention was drawn to scientific reports, which highlighted that methane emissions from the dumping ground posed a significant threat, being more harmful than carbon dioxide. The risks associated with such emissions were emphasised, particularly given the landfill’s location in a densely populated area. It was remarked that failure to treat the issue as a crisis could result in the suspension of operations at the site.
The proceedings were based on petitions filed by residents and environmental groups, who alleged prolonged exposure to hazardous conditions. It was argued that nearby communities had been adversely affected for years, with limited intervention from authorities. The situation was described as one where citizens had effectively been subjected to unsafe environmental conditions without adequate safeguards.
Challenges faced by the state-appointed committee were also presented, including the inability to conduct international visits to study advanced waste management systems due to geopolitical tensions. However, these constraints were not seen as sufficient justification for delays in implementing local solutions.
A final opportunity was granted to the authorities, with directions issued to initiate immediate corrective measures and explore alternative waste disposal sites away from residential zones. It was also indicated that accountability could be fixed on responsible officials if lapses continued. A deadline of April 27 was set for the submission of detailed affidavits outlining the steps to control pollution and monitor methane emissions. It was made clear that, should adverse impacts persist, closure of the dumping ground would be ordered in the interest of protecting human life.
