Demolition action was carried out on Saturday by the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) at HR College of Commerce and Economics near Churchgate, where unauthorised constructions within the campus were removed. The operation was conducted as part of a broader civic drive against illegal structures across Mumbai.
It was reported that asbestos sheds and enclosed rooms had been constructed within the college premises using brick partitions along staircase landings from the ground floor up to the fifth floor. Additionally, an unauthorised mezzanine floor situated beneath the registrar’s office was also dismantled during the action. These structures were stated to have been identified as violations during inspections conducted in 2024. A formal notice had previously been issued to the college by the civic body, directing the removal of the disputed constructions. In the notice, it had been warned that failure to comply “could result in imprisonment of those involved or the imposition of fines ranging from ₹5,000 to ₹25,000.” Following alleged non-compliance, enforcement measures were subsequently initiated.
In an official statement, it was conveyed by the college administration that active engagement had been maintained with the concerned authorities. It was further stated that a proposal seeking regularisation of the structures had been “duly submitted online.” The institution asserted that it remained “committed to working within the framework of law” and that compliance requirements were being appropriately addressed.
However, concerns were expressed by sources within the college regarding the timing of the demolition. It was indicated that the action had been carried out during ongoing lecture and examination hours. Reference was made to the earlier notice, which reportedly specified that such enforcement measures were to be undertaken on a holiday or non-working day. As Saturday is considered a working day for the college, it was stated that significant disruption had been caused to students, faculty members, and academic activities.
The episode was described by the institution as “disheartening,” particularly in light of its longstanding reputation and contribution to public education. While a commitment to “constructive dialogue” and a “lawful resolution of the matter” was reiterated, it was conveyed that greater institutional support had been expected.
Share
Tweet
