In a recent development, the Bombay High Court, comprising a two-judge bench, has put forth three potential solutions to address the ongoing issue surrounding the proposed government sports complex in Ghansoli. This significant ruling aims to provide a resolution for the parties involved and determine the future of the land in question.
Alternatives Presented by the High Court
The Times of India exclusively reported that the High Court bench has outlined three distinct alternatives, presenting a roadmap for potential resolutions to the complex matter. One option proposes the allocation of an alternate plot of land within the same vicinity or elsewhere for the developer, while the remaining portion of the plot could be earmarked for the sports complex. However, this suggestion is contingent upon approval from Cidco, the City and Industrial Development Corporation.
The second proposal revolves around Cidco's potential allocation of an alternative plot of equivalent size, situated in the nearby vicinity, exclusively for the sports complex's construction and development. The third and final alternative offers the possibility of relocating the sports complex to Mangaon in Raigad, marking a significant shift from its originally intended location in Ghansoli.
Petition and Judicial Emphasis
The Indian Institute of Architects-Navi Mumbai center, along with other respondents, has filed a petition challenging Cidco's handling of the government sports complex issue. In a judicial order dated July 14, 2023, Justices GS Kulkarni and Jitendra Jain emphasized the need for an amicable resolution due to the sale and allocation of a specific plot (plot 4, sector 12) within the sports complex area to a builder. The court stressed the importance of discussing the realignment of this plot to reach a consensus among the parties involved.
Directive for Parties and Subsequent Developments
As per the High Court's directive, the parties embroiled in the dispute are required to convene and address the issues at hand through a comprehensive meeting. This directive underscores the significance of maintaining fairness and considering the rights and arguments presented by all involved parties. A preliminary meeting held on July 24 yielded promising potential resolutions; however, the ultimate decision-making authority rests with the state cabinet.
Court's Extension and Timeline
Further developments in this matter occurred on July 28, when the same High Court bench extended the timeline for the state cabinet to finalize its decision by granting a four-week extension. During this period, the relief initially provided by the High Court to the concerned parties will remain in effect until the date of the adjourned hearing.
Background and Historical Context
The origins of the sports complex issue trace back to a public interest litigation filed in 2019, underscoring the enduring nature of the dispute. The government's original decision in 2003 to establish the sports complex in Navi Mumbai laid the groundwork for this ongoing legal tussle. It's worth noting that a taluka sports complex in Mangaon, although initially proposed, has remained inactive and garnered limited interest over the years.
Share
Tweet
